GOP States Double Down on Fighting Medication Abortion After Supreme Court Keeps It Legal

From the jump, the lawsuit challenging the legality of mifepristone was a cynical, propagandistic endeavor. In a 9-0 opinion, the Supreme Court threw it out.

Jordan Smith
Jordan Smith
Jordan Smith
The Intercept
Jordan Smith is a state and national award-winning investigative journalist based in Austin, Texas. She has covered criminal justice for more than 20 years and, during...
- The Intercept
Viewed 2 times
2 Min Read
This article has been archived, so the information may no longer be relevant and images or other features may no longer be working.

From the jump, the lawsuit challenging the legality of mifepristone was a cynical, propagandistic endeavor. In a 9-0 opinion, the Supreme Court threw it out.

In a unanimous ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge to the Food and Drug Administration’s 24-year-old approval of mifepristone, a common gynecological drug also used for medication abortion, ruling that the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to bring the suit in the first place. The ruling keeps mifepristone legal across the country — at least for now.

Under the Constitution, a plaintiff must be suffering some concrete injury to bring a federal lawsuit. In the mifepristone case — FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine — the suit was brought by a collection of anti-abortion advocates, some of them doctors, who neither provide abortion care nor prescribe mifepristone. Nonetheless, they claimed that somehow, someday they may be forced to treat a patient suffering complications from taking mifepristone, which they said granted them the right to sue.

The Supreme Court didn’t buy it. “The plaintiffs do not prescribe or use mifepristone,” and the FDA approval doesn’t require them to do so, Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the court. “Rather, the plaintiffs want FDA to make mifepristone more difficult for other doctors to prescribe and for pregnant women to obtain.” Their desire to make the drug “less available for others does not establish standing to sue.”

CONTINUE READING ON THE INTERCEPT

See more of our content in Google search results!

Share This Article
Jordan Smith
The Intercept
Jordan Smith is a state and national award-winning investigative journalist based in Austin, Texas. She has covered criminal justice for more than 20 years and, during that time, has developed a reputation as a resourceful and dogged reporter with a talent for analyzing complex social and legal issues. She is regarded as one of the best investigative reporters in Texas. A longtime staff writer for the Austin Chronicle, her work has also appeared in The Nation, the Crime Report, and Salon, among other places.