Indigenous Nations Propose Customs-Free Trade Corridor Across the US–Canada Border

Tribal leaders have outlined a plan for a customs-free trade corridor along historic pathways that would cross the U.S.–Canada border.

John Ahni Schertow, Intercontinental Cry
By
John Ahni Schertow, Intercontinental Cry
John Ahniwanika Schertow is an award-winning journalist and multimedia artist of Mohawk and European descent. For over two decades, Ahni has served as the driving force...
5 Min Read
Pasqua (left) and Echo (right) Lakes with Echo Valley Provincial Park and Standing Buffalo 78 Indian reserve in the middle. Photo: Masterhatch

A First Nation in Saskatchewan is moving forward with plans to create an Indigenous-led “customs-free trade corridor” that revives centuries-old trade routes, potentially reshaping cross-border commerce.

The Standing Buffalo Dakota Nation says the project would allow goods to move through Dakota territories in Saskatchewan, Alberta, Manitoba and into the U.S. without conventional border inspections or duties.

Leaders describe it as both an economic initiative and a reclamation of Indigenous sovereignty.

Indigenous nations propose customs-free trade corridor across the us–canada border

“That was the wealth of our nation; historically we had that,” Standing Buffalo Chief Roger Redman told CKOM.

For community leaders, the corridor is a way of making historical knowledge relevant today.

As Solomon Cyr, spokesperson for Standing Buffalo Dakota Nation, explained to the National Observer, “We’re operationalizing our old corridors — taking ancient trade routes our elders told us about and articulating them in a modern context.”

The Jay Treaty Precedent

The idea of Indigenous cross-border trade is not without legal precedent. The Jay Treaty of 1794, signed between the United States and Great Britain, affirmed that Indigenous peoples had the right to “freely pass and repass” the border and “freely carry on trade and commerce” without duties.

Customs-free trade corridor jay treaty of 1974
The Jay Treaty of 1794 was a peace and trade agreement between the United States and Great Britain that averted war, resolving outstanding issues from the American Revolutionary War.

In the United States, courts have upheld those rights. Indigenous citizens from Canada who can show at least 50 percent Indigenous ancestry are recognized as having the right to live and work in the U.S. without immigration restrictions.

This recognition has allowed Haudenosaunee, Anishinaabe, and other nations to maintain cross-border ties.

Canada, however, never incorporated the treaty into domestic law. As a result, First Nations people moving goods into Canada remain subject to customs enforcement. This uneven application has led to decades of disputes.

The Mohawk community of Akwesasne, whose territory straddles Quebec, Ontario, and New York, has long been at the center of these conflicts.

Residents often face checkpoints, seizures, and legal challenges when transporting tobacco, fuel, or even groceries across the border — despite their view that such movement is protected by treaty rights.

In the 1990s and 2000s, Mohawk entrepreneurs were repeatedly prosecuted for tobacco trade, sparking confrontations and reinforcing calls for recognition of Indigenous cross-border commerce.

Similar disputes have arisen among other Haudenosaunee nations, who maintain that their sovereignty predates and supersedes federal customs regimes.

For them, the Jay Treaty is not simply a historical artifact, but a living agreement that affirms Indigenous jurisdiction across borders.

Ambitions and Hurdles

The Standing Buffalo Dakota Nation envisions a trade system that allows goods to move through Indigenous territories without conventional customs checks or duties.

Supporters say the corridor could create jobs, expand Indigenous businesses, and foster inter-nation partnerships across North America.

But the plan faces significant obstacles. Customs and trade are regulated by national governments, and international treaties such as NAFTA’s successor, the USMCA, set rules for cross-border commerce.

It is highly probable that Ottawa and Washington will see the corridor as a challenge to state sovereignty.

Infrastructure and financing are also unresolved. Building roads, storage facilities, or checkpoints across Indigenous territories would require substantial investment.

Federal officials have not yet said whether they would consider exemptions for goods moving along the proposed route.

A Broader Shift

The trade corridor proposal comes as Indigenous nations across Canada are asserting more control over resource development, infrastructure, and economic planning. 

For many Indigenous nations, the trade corridor is more than an entry point into an existing economic system. It is a chance to reshape it altogether.

The Standing Buffalo Dakota Nation says feasibility studies and consultations with other Indigenous nations are planned for the coming months.

Leaders hope to build alliances with communities in the U.S. and Mexico, creating a truly continental Indigenous trade network.

Observers note that the future of the project hinges on whether Indigenous leaders can attract political backing and investment while preserving control over its direction.

For now, the corridor remains an early-stage vision that could transform the landscape of sovereignty and trade, or stall against the same barriers that have long constrained Indigenous economic autonomy.

This article was originally published on Intercontinental Cry and republished here under a Creative Commons license.

Share This Article
John Ahniwanika Schertow is an award-winning journalist and multimedia artist of Mohawk and European descent. For over two decades, Ahni has served as the driving force behind Intercontinental Cry (IC). As a poet and freelance journalist, Ahni's work has been featured in the Guardian, Toward Freedom, the Dominion, Madre, Swerve Magazine and many other publications. He can be reached by email at intercontinentalcry [at] gmail.com
Protected by CleanTalk Anti-Spam