Guantánamo Prosecutors Accused of “Outrageous” Misconduct for Trying to Use Torture Testimony

Government prosecutors claimed they didn’t know a former detainee recanted his testimony in interviews with the government.

The front entrance of the U.S. military commission court at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, on June 27, 2023. Photo: Elise Swain
Intercepted Podcast
Intercepted Podcast
A Podcast by the Investigative Journalism outlet, The Intercept.
This article has been archived, so the information may no longer be relevant and images or other features may no longer be working.

Government prosecutors claimed they didn’t know a former detainee recanted his testimony in interviews with the government.

In a pretrial hearing Tuesday at the Guantánamo Bay military tribunal, Clive Stafford Smith, a lawyer for a potential witness in the war crimes case, accused government prosecutors of “outrageous” misconduct.

During the hearing for the case of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, who is charged with masterminding the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole, Stafford Smith said the government attorneys had failed to release exculpatory information about Nashiri and made false statements in the course of their failure.

Stafford Smith, the lead counsel for Ahmed Rabbani, a former Guantánamo detainee who was tortured by the CIA, made the allegations after being called to the witness stand by Nashiri’s defense team.

Stafford Smith testified that the prosecutors had filed a brief that falsely said Rabbani had not recanted his initial testimony because, Rabbani said, it was made under torture. After raising the omission, Stafford Smith said, he felt it was not getting due attention and took the unusual step of reporting the prosecutors to their state bar associations.

CONTINUE READING ON THE INTERCEPT

See more of our content in Google search results!

Share This Article
A Podcast by the Investigative Journalism outlet, The Intercept.